Search · Ranked & Scored

The Best AI Brand Visibility Trackers for Small B2B Teams, Scored

Being invisible when a prospect asks ChatGPT for 'the best X' is the new page two. We compared five AI visibility platforms against their official 2026 pricing and docs to find the one a 5-to-30-person B2B team should actually pay for.

By Lena Falk· Analyst, Productivity & Search·September 7, 2026·5 products tested
The Verdict

Peec AI is the one to beat for a small B2B team. It publishes its prices, tracks six of the engines your buyers actually use on a single dashboard, gives you unlimited seats on every plan, and offers a source-citation view that tells you which pages the AI answers were actually built on. Otterly.AI is the pick if you're a solo founder or a two-person team who just needs to know whether you show up at all, and $29/month buys a real, working tracker. Semrush's AI Visibility Toolkit earns its keep only if you already live in Semrush. Skip Profound and AthenaHQ unless you're an enterprise buyer; both are built for a bigger org than yours.

AI assistants are quietly becoming the new vendor shortlist. When a prospect asks ChatGPT "best CRM for a 10-person consultancy" or Perplexity "top alternatives to [your competitor]," the answer they get shapes who they even consider. If your brand isn't named, you're out before the demo call is ever booked. Traditional rank trackers can't see any of this, which is why a new category of "AI visibility" tools has landed in 2026, promising to tell you which prompts you show up in, which competitors are winning them, and which sources the engines are citing to build their answers.

The problem is that the category is genuinely messy. Pricing pages are half hidden behind demo forms, engine coverage changes month to month, and the "starter" plan of the most-hyped platform tracks exactly one model. We compared five of the most-cited platforms (Peec AI, Otterly.AI, Semrush's AI Visibility Toolkit, Profound, and AthenaHQ) against their official current pricing and documentation. No hands-on account testing this round: what you're reading is a documentation-and-pricing comparison for a small B2B team that has to decide where its first $100 to $500 of AI visibility budget goes. When we say "verified," we mean it against each vendor's own page.

How We Tested

5 measured metrics

Five metrics, weighted for a 5-to-30-person B2B team on a real budget. Engine Coverage and Price-to-Value carry the most weight, because a $99 plan that only tracks ChatGPT solves half the problem, and a $495 plan you can't afford solves none of it. Every score reflects what the vendor's official documentation and pricing page said on the day we checked, not our hunches about the roadmap.

Engine Coverage

We pulled each vendor's official pricing and product-documentation pages and counted how many of the six engines that actually influence a B2B buyer in 2026 (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot) are tracked on the cheapest paid plan without a paid add-on or an Enterprise call. Add-on engines and demo-gated ones counted as zero.

Price-to-Value

We anchored each product at its cheapest publicly listed self-serve plan and priced out what that plan actually gets you (prompts, seats, tracking cadence, and any hidden per-domain or per-seat surcharges). Where a vendor gates a feature to a plan two tiers up, that plan's price was noted so a small-team buyer can see the real ceiling, not just the entry ticket.

Actionability

From each vendor's documentation, we recorded whether the platform surfaces the specific source URLs an AI answer cited (so you know which pages to write or pitch), whether it flags competitor-only prompts (prompts where a competitor wins and you're absent), and whether it delivers a ranked list of recommended actions rather than a raw dashboard. "Reports and stops there" scored lower; "here's what to ship next" scored higher.

Small-Team Fit

We read each vendor's plan structure specifically through the lens of a 5-to-30-person B2B team. Points for unlimited seats and transparent pricing; points off for per-seat fees, per-domain surcharges, credit-based bills that make monthly cost unpredictable, or feature paywalls that push the plan you actually need into Enterprise-quote territory.

Trial & Escape Hatch

We recorded each vendor's published trial terms (length, card requirement) and whether the platform has any published discount for annual billing. A no-card free trial scored highest, a discounted first month scored middle, and a demo-only path with no self-serve trial scored lowest, because a small team without procurement power needs to try before it buys.

Editors’ Choice
Rank1
Peec AI
Peec AI
The best small-team pick in the category, and the only one we'd buy without a demo call.
89

Peec AI is a self-serve AI search analytics tool built around a simple loop: you supply the prompts your buyers plausibly type into an assistant, and Peec runs them daily across the engines you choose, reporting how often your brand is mentioned, how it stacks up against competitors, and which source URLs the assistants cited to build each answer. That last piece, the citation-source view, is the part worth paying for, because it turns "we're invisible" into "here are the four pages we need to earn a mention on." Coverage is genuinely broad for the price (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, and Microsoft Copilot are the standard-plan engines, though standard tiers cap you at three at a time), and the unlimited-seats policy means the CMO, the content lead, and three writers can all look at the same dashboard without a per-seat tax. The catches: Claude, DeepSeek, and a few others sit behind Enterprise, there's no direct Google Analytics connection called out on the standard plans, and jumping from three tracked models to more pushes the price up quickly.

Source: Peec AI ↗

Pros

  • Transparent published pricing on the Starter tier: 50 prompts across three tracked engines with daily tracking
  • Unlimited seats on every paid plan, so the whole team can log in without a per-user fee
  • Native source-citation view names the URLs assistants cited, which is the play a small team can actually act on
  • Six engines available on standard plans (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Copilot); pick three at a time on Starter
  • Free trial published; annual billing knocks 15% off

Cons

  • Standard plans cap you at three tracked engines simultaneously; adding a fourth is a paid add-on
  • Claude Sonnet, DeepSeek, Qwen, and Mistral require the custom-priced Enterprise tier
  • Monitoring only: Peec identifies opportunities but won't write or publish content
  • No native Google Analytics integration called out on standard plans

How It Scored, by Metric

Engine Coverage90
Price-to-Value92
Actionability85
Small-Team Fit94
Trial & Escape Hatch86
Best for  Small B2B marketing teams (5 to 30 people) that want a clean, transparent AI visibility tracker and don't need enterprise attribution.
Rank2
Otterly.AI
Otterly
The cheapest real paid entry in the category, a legitimate $29/month plan, not a decoy.
83

Otterly.AI publishes its prices on the front page and starts at $29/month, which is enough to buy a working plan rather than a teaser. The Lite tier tracks 15 prompts across four base engines (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot), covers 50-plus countries, includes 1,000 GEO URL audits, and, remarkably at the price, carries unlimited team members. Every tier runs the same feature set daily, so what scales with the plan is really prompt volume, workspaces, and audit allowance. The trade-off is that Gemini, Google AI Mode, and Claude are paid add-ons ($9 to $439/month each depending on tier), which means the "six engine" story only fully lands once you're on Standard at $189/month, and the jump from Lite to Standard is a 6x price cliff for teams that outgrow 15 prompts. For a solo founder or a two-person team that just needs to know whether they show up at all, though, this is the honest starting point.

Source: Otterly ↗

Pros

  • Genuine $29/month entry price with a real feature set, not a decoy plan
  • Unlimited team members on every tier, including Lite
  • Four base engines included: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot
  • Free trial with no credit card required
  • GEO audit layer is well-developed for the price and useful for spotting AI-crawler blockers

Cons

  • Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Claude are paid add-ons; six-engine coverage costs extra
  • Big jump from Lite ($29, 15 prompts) to Standard ($189, 100 prompts) with no middle tier
  • API and MCP server access don't start until the $189 Standard plan
  • Overage prompts are $99 per 100, which stings if you cross the line mid-month

How It Scored, by Metric

Engine Coverage74
Price-to-Value92
Actionability78
Small-Team Fit88
Trial & Escape Hatch90
Best for  Founder-led teams (1 to 4 people) and lean startups validating whether AI search demand is real for their category before spending real money.
Rank3
Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Semrush
The one to grab if you already pay for Semrush; the wrong door to walk through if you don't.
76

Semrush's AI Visibility Toolkit is a $99/month per-domain add-on that bolts AI-answer tracking onto the SEO suite. It reports an AI Visibility Score, tracks 25 custom prompts daily, and covers ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Perplexity. If you're a small B2B team that already runs Semrush for keyword research and site audits, adding this next to your existing dashboards is the least-friction way to start reporting on AI visibility. The catch, and it's a real one, is that the standalone $99 stacks fast: Semrush's own documentation notes that additional domains cost $99 apiece per month, additional prompt packs cost $60 per 50 prompts, and each teammate who needs access to the toolkit requires their own $99 license. There's no free trial of the toolkit itself, so a small team without a Semrush contract is walking into a paid commitment on day one.

Source: Semrush ↗

Pros

  • $99/month add-on cost is transparent and reasonable for a single domain
  • Covers ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Perplexity in a familiar Semrush dashboard
  • Semrush One bundles fold the SEO and AI Visibility toolkits together with higher prompt-tracking limits for teams that need both
  • Daily updates for prompt tracking and AI analysis reports

Cons

  • No free trial of the AI Visibility Toolkit
  • Base plan is 1 domain, 25 prompts; additional domains are $99/month each and each additional user requires their own $99 license
  • Per-seat and per-domain stacking makes the real bill unpredictable for agencies and multi-brand teams
  • Claude, Copilot, DeepSeek, and Grok aren't listed among the toolkit's covered platforms in the fetched documentation

How It Scored, by Metric

Engine Coverage78
Price-to-Value74
Actionability75
Small-Team Fit70
Trial & Escape Hatch68
Best for  Small B2B teams already running Semrush who want AI visibility next to their existing keyword and rank-tracking data.
Rank4
Profound
Profound
The most-hyped platform in the category, and the one small teams should be most careful about.
72

Profound is the platform enterprise buyers keep bringing up, and there's a real product underneath the reputation: broad model coverage across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, and Claude, a Prompt Volumes dataset that sees what millions of people ask AI, and Agent Analytics that tracks how your site is interpreted and crawled by the major AI engines. The pricing story is where a small team has to be careful. Profound doesn't publish self-serve pricing on its homepage; every path leads to a "Get a Demo" or "Get Started" CTA, which means a small team without procurement power is negotiating from a weak position before it even sees a number. That's a real problem for a 15-person B2B team that just wants to know if the tool fits the budget.

Source: Profound ↗

Pros

  • Deepest enterprise data in the category: Agent Analytics for AI crawlers, Prompt Volumes, and Answer Engine Insights
  • Broadest engine coverage named on the homepage (Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Microsoft Copilot, DeepSeek, and Google AI Overviews)
  • Serves a real enterprise customer base, per its own case-study coverage
  • Agent workflows for AEO/SEO, content, and PR functions

Cons

  • No self-serve pricing published; every plan path is demo-gated
  • Product complexity is real; reviewers describe it as powerful but with a learning curve
  • Small teams without procurement power negotiate from a weak position against enterprise sales

How It Scored, by Metric

Engine Coverage68
Price-to-Value60
Actionability84
Small-Team Fit58
Trial & Escape Hatch62
Best for  Larger orgs (roughly 50+ people) with a dedicated AI search owner, budget for a demo-gated platform, and a real reason to care about crawler analytics and prompt-volume data.
Rank5
AthenaHQ
AthenaHQ
The most ambitious product in the category, built for a bigger team than yours.
70

AthenaHQ is the AI visibility platform you keep seeing in the category discussions because it's genuinely trying to close the loop: its Starter plan tracks visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, and Meta AI, ships direct Shopify, Webflow, GA4, and Google Search Console integrations for revenue attribution, and layers on autonomous content agents that generate GEO-optimized recommendations. That's the good news. The pricing is the problem for a small team. The Starter plan lists at $295/month, includes 3,600 credits, and runs on a credit-based consumption model where one credit equals one AI response, which means monthly spend depends on how many prompts and responses you actually consume. API access and additional credits are paid add-ons on top of Starter, and features like the ACE Citation Engine, SSO, and multi-region coverage sit behind a custom-priced Enterprise contract. There's a free Essential tier with 300 credits and five engines that's genuinely useful for kicking the tires. If you're an ecommerce brand with revenue attribution as your reason to buy, AthenaHQ is worth a look. For most 10-person B2B teams, it's overkill at the wrong price.

Source: AthenaHQ ↗

Pros

  • Ten engines included on the Starter plan: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, and Meta AI
  • Direct Shopify, Webflow, GA4, and Google Search Console integrations for revenue attribution, genuinely rare in the category
  • Autonomous content optimization agent generates on-page and off-page actions, not just a score
  • Free Essential tier with 300 credits and five engines

Cons

  • $295/month Starter price prices out most small B2B teams
  • Credit-based consumption model (1 credit = 1 AI response) makes real monthly spend depend on usage
  • Most advanced features (ACE Citation Engine, multi-region, SSO, executive BI dashboards) are Enterprise-only
  • API access and extra credits on Starter are billed as paid add-ons
  • Starter is single-region and single-language; multi-market teams get pushed to Enterprise immediately

How It Scored, by Metric

Engine Coverage88
Price-to-Value55
Actionability82
Small-Team Fit52
Trial & Escape Hatch60
Best for  Ecommerce brands and mid-market teams whose main reason to buy is tying AI citations to Shopify or GA4 revenue, not small B2B teams starting from scratch.

A note on how we landed on this order, because it wasn’t the field we expected going in.

We started this comparison assuming Profound would win. It’s the platform everyone in the category name-drops, and its Prompt Volumes dataset is the one piece of technology in the category that competitors genuinely can’t replicate. But the moment you try to price it out for a small B2B team, the story changes: Profound doesn’t publish self-serve pricing, every path on the homepage is a “Get a Demo” CTA, and a 15-person team without procurement power has no business walking into that sales cycle blind. It’s a great product built for the wrong buyer.

Peec AI is what a small team should actually pay for. It publishes its prices, unlimited seats are on every tier, and the citation-source view (the one that names the actual URLs the AI answers were built on) is the piece a small team can turn into a to-do list on Monday morning. That’s the whole game. If Peec says “these three pages are winning your category’s AI answers this week,” you know exactly where to pitch a mention, publish a competitor comparison, or shore up your own page. It’s not the deepest tool on this list, and Claude coverage sits behind Enterprise, but nothing else on the field is putting up a fight on value at Peec’s Starter tier.

Otterly is the pick for anyone below Peec’s price point. A real $29/month plan in a category where the median headline price is $250 is worth showing up for, and the fact that Otterly bundles unlimited seats into even that plan is quietly the most small-team-friendly move any vendor made this year. It’s not what you’d standardize on at 25 people, but it’s the honest place to start if you’re two founders and a laptop.

Semrush is the “already in the ecosystem” answer. If you pay for Semrush anyway, the $99 add-on is fine. If you don’t, you’re paying $99 per domain, $99 per additional user license, and $60 for every extra 50 prompts before you’ve tracked much of anything. And AthenaHQ deserves the credit it gets for actually trying to close the loop between AI visibility and Shopify revenue, but $295/month plus a credit-based bill you can’t fully predict is a lot to ask a 10-person B2B team that just wants to know if it shows up in ChatGPT.

One caveat worth naming: pricing and engine coverage in this category are churning every few weeks. Everything here reflects each vendor’s official page on the day we checked, and every URL is in the Sources list. If you’re about to sign a contract, load the page yourself and confirm the number before you do.

If you’re also trying to fix the SEO side of the same problem, our best AI SEO tools ranking covers the tools that help you rank on Google’s own results page, and the best AI blog writing tools for SEO is the closest sibling to this list, because the pages your AI visibility tracker tells you to write are the same pages an SEO blog writer helps you ship. And for local-service B2B, our guide on how to get your Google Business Profile into AI Overviews is the companion move for teams whose buyers are more likely to ask an AI where the “best local X near me” is than they’re to type a category-level product query.

Pick the tool that matches the size of your team and the size of your problem, and start acting on the data. The gap between #1 and #5 on this list is smaller than the badges suggest. The real gap is between a team that watches its AI visibility every week and one that doesn’t watch it at all.

Sources

FAQ

What's the best AI brand visibility tracker for a small B2B team?

Peec AI. It scored 89 on our bench and takes Editors' Choice because it publishes its prices, covers six of the engines your buyers actually use, gives you unlimited seats on every plan, and offers a source-citation view that turns "we're invisible" into "here are the four pages we need to fix." Otterly.AI (83) is the runner-up and the pick if you're a solo founder validating whether AI search demand is real for you at all.

Is there a genuinely cheap way to start tracking AI brand visibility?

Yes. Otterly.AI's Lite plan is $29/month for 15 prompts across four base engines (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot) with unlimited team members and no credit card required for the trial. It's the honest entry point if you have more time than budget. Just note that Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Claude are paid add-ons on Otterly, and the jump from Lite to Standard is a 6x price cliff.

Why isn't Profound the top pick if everyone talks about it?

Because Profound is built for an enterprise buyer, not a small B2B team. Its homepage doesn't publish self-serve pricing; every CTA routes you to a demo. For a 15-person team without procurement power, walking into a demo-gated sales cycle before you even see a number is the wrong shape of buying process.

Do I need this if I'm already paying for Semrush?

Maybe. Semrush's AI Visibility Toolkit is a $99/month per-domain add-on on top of your existing subscription. If you're a single-domain B2B team already living in Semrush, it's the lowest-friction way to add AI visibility to your existing keyword and site-audit reports. If you manage several domains or want per-prompt source-citation depth, Peec AI at a similar price gives you more for the same money.

How did you actually score these?

This ranking is a documentation-and-pricing comparison, not a hands-on account test. Every claim about a plan, price, engine list, or feature was pulled from each vendor's own official pricing or documentation page on the day we checked, and every one of those pages is in the Sources list above. We scored five metrics (Engine Coverage, Price-to-Value, Actionability, Small-Team Fit, and Trial & Escape Hatch), weighted for a 5-to-30-person B2B team on a real budget, and combined them into the single 0-to-100 number on the badge.